Abstract

Introduction:  Bipolar disorder is a difficult to treat condition where mood stabilizers play a major role along with adjunctive therapy.

Objectives: Objectives of this study were to evaluate Lamotrigine in the treatment of Bipolar depression; to assess the role of psychosocial factors in modifying the response to treatment and also to evaluate treatment satisfaction with medication.

Methodology: Patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder receiving Lamotrigine with or without other mood stabilizers were administered Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAM-D) at week 0 and week 4. The HAM-D scores were compared to evaluate efficacy. Patients were also administered a Trauma Experience Checklist (TEC) at week 0 to report whether any traumatizing event existed in their life that could modify response to treatment. These events were classified as acute, chronic or no stressor. HAM-D scores in patients with different stressors were evaluated to find out if any correlation existed between stressors and response to treatment. A questionnaire regarding patient satisfaction with treatment (TSQM version 1.4) was administered at week 4. Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests were used for calculating the statistics and p value <0.05 was considered significant.

Result: 37 patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder receiving Lamotrigine 200mg/day were enrolled in the study.  13 patients received other mood stabilizers like lithium or valproate. Adjunctive drugs included hypnotics, antipsychotics, antidepressants and miscellaneous drugs. There was significant improvement in HAM-D scores in patients with mild, moderate and severe depression. There was significant improvement in depression associated parameters like depressed mood, suicidal thoughts, anxiety, insomnia, somatic symptoms and work and activities. Patients with no stressors and acute stressors showed a greater response to therapy as compared to chronic stressors. In them the response was significant. Patient satisfaction with treatment was 93% both in euthymic patients and patients with depression.

Conclusion: lamotrigine is efficacious in the treatment of Bipolar disorder; both for maintenance of euthymia and improvement of depression. Presence of chronic stressors in patient’s life have a detrimental effect on response to treatment as compared to no stressors and acute stressors. We found patient satisfaction with treatment of about 93%.

Keywords: Lamotrigine; Bipolar Depression; Patient Satisfaction With Treatment; Trauma Experience

References

1. Grande I., et al. “Bipolar disorder”. Lancet10227 (2016): 1561-1572.
2. Podawiltz A. “A review of current bipolar disorder treatment guidelines”. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 3 (2012): e12.
3. Bowden CL. “Treatment strategies for bipolar depression”. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 5 (2010): e10.
4. Prabhavalkar Kedar S., et al. “Management of bipolar depression with lamotrigine: an antiepileptic mood stabilizer”. Frontiers in Pharmacology 6 (2015): 242.
5. Reid JG., et al. “Lamotrigine in psychiatric disorders”. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 7 (2013): 675-684.
6. Aldinger Fanny and Schulze Thomas G. “Environmental factors, life events, and trauma in the course of bipolar disorder”. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 1 (2017): 6-17.
7. Gershon A., et al. “Chronic Stressors and Trauma: Prospective Influences on the Course of Bipolar Disorder”. Psychological Medicine 12 (2013): 2583-2592.
8. Hamilton M. “A rating scale for depression”. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 23 (1960): 56-62.
9. Nijenhuis ERS., et al. “The psychometric characteristics of the Traumatic Experiences Questionnaire (TEC): First findings among psychiatric outpatients”. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy3 (2002): 200-210.
10. Vermersch Patrick., et al. “Measuring treatment satisfaction in MS: Is the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication fit for purpose?” Multiple Sclerosis4 (2017): 604-613.
11. Diflorio Arianna and Jones Ian. “Is sex important? Gender differences in Bipolar disorder”. International Review of Psychiatr 5 (2010): 437-452.
12. Rihmer Z., et al. “Treatment of bipolar disorder with lamotrigine -- relapse rate and suicidal behavior during 6-month follow-up”. Neuropsychopharmacology Hung1 (2015): 7-13.
13. Goodwin GM., et al. “A pooled analysis of 2 placebo-controlled 18-month trials of lamotrigine and lithium maintenance in bipolar I disorder”. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 3 (2004): 432-441.
14. Ketter TA and Calabrese JR. “Stabilization of mood from below versus above baseline in bipolar disorder: a new nomenclature”. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatr 2 (2002): 146-151.
15. Bowden CL., et al. “Lamotrigine in the treatment of bipolar depression”. European Neuropsychopharmacology 4 (1999): S113-S117.
16. Dienes KA., et al. “The stress sensitization hypothesis: understanding the course of bipolar disorder”. Journal of Affective Disorders 1-3 (2006): 43-49.
17. Gershon A., et al. “Chronic Stressors and Trauma: Prospective Influences on the Course of Bipolar Disorder”. Psychological Medicine 12 (2014): 2583-2592.
18. Miklowitz DJ., et al. “Family Factors and the Course of Bipolar Affective Disorder”. Archives Of General Psychiatry 3 (1988): 225-231.