Research Article
Volume 12 Issue 9 - 2021
The Evolution of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation Over the Past 20 Years
Ananthi Subramaniam1, Siti Nur Hidayatul Arifah Ibrahim1, Bee Khee Ng1, Rachel Ee Lyn Tan1, Wee Kian Yeo2, Harald Burchardt1 and Joerg Teichmann1*
1Sport Therapy, Rehamed Therapy SDN BHD, Malaysia
2National Sports Institute of Malaysia, Malaysia
*Corresponding Author: Joerg Teichmann, Sport Therapy, Rehamed Therapy SDN BHD, Malaysia.
Received: July 23, 2021; Published: August 28, 2021




Abstract

Background: The Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) rupture is a common knee injury across various sports, consequently making its reconstruction (ACLr) a common surgical procedure in sports medicine. ACL reconstruction rehabilitation has evolved over the past 20 years.

Aim: To determine the difference in the rehabilitation phases, uses of open and closed kinetic chain exercise, and the testing done before return to play between the 1990s and 2017 onwards.

Methods: The study is done in two stages, (1) articles were retrieved by online database search with keywords for the time period between January 1992 to December 2017. (2) The retrieved articles’ titles, abstracts and content were reviewed to assess the eligibility for the inclusion in this review.

Results: This review has found that over the years the graft choice has evolved from patellar tendon to hamstring tendon autograft. This is to reduce post-surgery complication and reduced ACL re-injury. However, both patellar tendon and hamstring tendon is widely used until today as that both grafts have their own benefits and drawbacks. While, for the rehabilitation phases post ACLr has been revised and improved with more enhanced method of testing before return to sport. The rehabilitation period has been extended to 9 months in the 2000s by adding one more additional phase which is prevention phase, while in 1990s an accelerated rehabilitation program would return the athlete to play in 4 months’ time on average and the return to sport phase started sooner at 4th month. The open and closed kinetic chain exercises can begin as the athlete able tolerate the load, however the angle of the knee has to take into consideration while prescribing the exercises. Variation of the testing battery depending on the sports participated and type of level prior to return to sports are a key indicator of athlete’s readiness post ACLr.

Conclusion: This study concludes that ACLr has evolved significantly in past 20 years together with the graft choice and fixation method. Enhanced graft fixation together with longer rehabilitation process and in-depth testing have resulted in the re-injury of the ACL reconstruction reducing over the years.

Keywords: Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL); Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLr); Knee Joint

References

  1. Abulhasan J and Grey M. “Anatomy and physiology of knee stability”. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology4 (2017): 34.
  2. “BTB Vs Hamsrtings – Is There a Winner Yet?” Asianarthroscopy (2016).
  3. Akoto R., et al. “Epidemiology of injuries in judo: a cross-sectional survey of severe injuries based on time loss and reduction in sporting level”. British Journal of Sports Medicine 17 (2018): 1109-1115.
  4. Buller LT., et al. “Trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States”. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine: SAGE Journals 1 (2015): 2325967114563664.
  5. Chambat P., et al. “The evolution of ACL reconstruction over the last fifty years”. International Orthopaedics 2 (2013): 181-186.
  6. Cerulli G., et al. “ACL reconstruction: Choosing the graft”. Joints 1 (2013): 18-24.
  7. Dargel J., et al. “Biomechanics of the anterior cruciate ligament and implications for surgical reconstruction”. Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction 1 (2007): 1-12.
  8. Decarlo MS., et al. “Traditional versus accelerated rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction: A one-year follow-up”. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 6 (1992): 309-316.
  9. De Carlo MS and McDivitt R. “Rehabilitation of patients following autogenic bone-patellar tendon-bone ACL reconstruction: A 20-year perspective”. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy3 (2006): 108-123.
  10. Erickson BJ., et al. “Performance and return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in male Major League Soccer players”. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine: SAGE Journals2 (2013): 2325967113497189.
  11. Grant JA. “Updating recommendations for rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction: A review: A review”. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine6 (2013): 501-502.
  12. Glass R., et al. “The effects of open versus closed kinetic chain exercises on patients with ACL deficient or reconstructed knees: A systematic review”. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy2 (2010): 74-84.
  13. Janssen RPA., et al. “Similar clinical outcome between patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autograft after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with accelerated, brace-free rehabilitation: a systematic review”. Journal of ISAKOS6 (2017): 308-317.
  14. Jewiss D., et al. “Open versus closed kinetic chain exercises following an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis”. Journal of Sports Medicine (2017): 4721548.
  15. Joseph AM., et al. “A multisport epidemiologic comparison of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in high school athletics”. Journal of Athletic Training6 (2013): 810-817.
  16. Kautzner J., et al. “A comparison of ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring autograft in female patients: a prospective randomised study”. International Orthopaedics1 (2015): 125-130.
  17. Malempati C., et al. “Current rehabilitation concepts for anterior cruciate ligament surgery in athletes”. Orthopedics11 (2015): 689-696.
  18. Manske RC., et al. “Recent advances following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: rehabilitation perspectives: Critical reviews in rehabilitation medicine: Critical reviews in rehabilitation medicine”. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine1 (2012): 59-71.
  19. Myer GD., et al. “Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: criteria-based progression through the return-to-sport phase”. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy6 (2006): 385-402.
  20. Nazir AHMAD A. “Ideal rehabilitation programme after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Review of evidence”. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science15 (2016): 56-56.
  21. Poehling-Monaghan KL., et al. “Long-term outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of patellar tendon versus hamstring autografts”. Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine6 (2017): 2325967117709735.
  22. Ranjan R., et al. “Recent concepts of rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction”. Saudi Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences1 (2016): 1.
  23. Sanders TL., et al. “Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: A 21-year population-based study: A 21-year population-based study”. American Journal of Sports Medicine6 (2016): 1502-1507.
  24. Samuelsen BT., et al. “Hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction: Is there a difference in graft failure rate? A meta-analysis of 47,613 patients”. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research10 (2017): 2459-2468.
  25. Schilaty ND., et al. “Incidence of second anterior cruciate ligament tears (1990-2000) and associated factors in a specific geographic locale”. American Journal of Sports Medicine7 (2017): 1567-1573.
  26. Schilaty ND., et al. “Incidence of second anterior cruciate ligament tears and identification of associated risk factors from 2001 to 2010 using a geographic database”. American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine8 (2017): 2325967117724196.
  27. Shelbourne KD and Nitz P. “Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction”. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy6 (1992): 256-264.
  28. Shelbourne KD. “Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction”. Knee4 (1996): 228-231.
  29. Shelbourne KD and Gray T. “Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon graft followed by accelerated rehabilitation. A two- to nine-year followup: A two- to nine-year followup”. American Journal of Sports Medicine6 (1997): 786-795.
  30. Teichmann J., et al. “Improvement of elite female athletes’ physical performance with a 3-week unexpected disturbance program”. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation1 (2018): 1-7.
  31. Teichmann J., et al. “Unexpected-Disturbance Program for rehabilitation of high-performance athletes”. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation2 (2016): 126-132.
  32. Thomeé R., et al. “Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction”. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy11 (2011): 1798-1805.
  33. Van Grinsven S., et al. “Evidence-based rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction”. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8 (2010): 1128-1144.
  34. Van Melick N., et al. “Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus”. British Journal of Sports Medicine 24 (2016): 1506-1515.
  35. Waldén M., et al. “Anterior cruciate ligament injury in elite football: a prospective three-cohort study”. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 1 (2011): 11-19.
  36. Waldén M., et al. “ACL injuries in men’s professional football: a 15-year prospective study on time trends and return-to-play rates reveals only 65% of players still play at the top level 3 years after ACL rupture”. British Journal of Sports Medicine 12 (2016): 744-750.
  37. Wetters N., et al. “Mechanism of injury and risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury”. Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine 1 (2016): 2-6.
  38. Wilk KE., et al. “Recent advances in the rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament injuries”. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy3 (2012): 153-171.
  39. Wright RW., et al. “Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation: MOON guidelines: MOON guidelines”. Sports Health3 (2015): 239-243.
  40. Xie X., et al. “A meta-analysis of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction”. Knee2 (2015): 100-110.
  41. Yack HJ., et al. “Comparison of closed and open kinetic chain exercise in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee”. American Journal of Sports Medicine1 (1993): 49-54.
  42. Zaffagnini S., et al. “Return to sport after ACL reconstruction: how, when and why? A narrative review of current evidence”. Joints1 (2015): 25-30.
Citation: Joerg Teichmann., et al. “The Evolution of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation Over the Past 20 Years”. EC Orthopaedics 12.9 (2021): 14-26.

PubMed Indexed Article


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
LC-UV-MS and MS/MS Characterize Glutathione Reactivity with Different Isomers (2,2' and 2,4' vs. 4,4') of Methylene Diphenyl-Diisocyanate.

PMID: 31143884 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6536005


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Alzheimer's Pathogenesis, Metal-Mediated Redox Stress, and Potential Nanotheranostics.

PMID: 31565701 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6764777


EC Neurology
Differences in Rate of Cognitive Decline and Caregiver Burden between Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Dementia: a Retrospective Study.

PMID: 27747317 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5065347


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Will Blockchain Technology Transform Healthcare and Biomedical Sciences?

PMID: 31460519 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6711478


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Is it a Prime Time for AI-powered Virtual Drug Screening?

PMID: 30215059 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6133253


EC Psychology and Psychiatry
Analysis of Evidence for the Combination of Pro-dopamine Regulator (KB220PAM) and Naltrexone to Prevent Opioid Use Disorder Relapse.

PMID: 30417173 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6226033


EC Anaesthesia
Arrest Under Anesthesia - What was the Culprit? A Case Report.

PMID: 30264037 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6155992


EC Orthopaedics
Distraction Implantation. A New Technique in Total Joint Arthroplasty and Direct Skeletal Attachment.

PMID: 30198026 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6124505


EC Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine
Prevalence and factors associated with self-reported chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults aged 40-79: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2012.

PMID: 30294723 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6169793


EC Dental Science
Important Dental Fiber-Reinforced Composite Molding Compound Breakthroughs

PMID: 29285526 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5743211


EC Microbiology
Prevalence of Intestinal Parasites Among HIV Infected and HIV Uninfected Patients Treated at the 1o De Maio Health Centre in Maputo, Mozambique

PMID: 29911204 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5999047


EC Microbiology
Macrophages and the Viral Dissemination Super Highway

PMID: 26949751 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC4774560


EC Microbiology
The Microbiome, Antibiotics, and Health of the Pediatric Population.

PMID: 27390782 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC4933318


EC Microbiology
Reactive Oxygen Species in HIV Infection

PMID: 28580453 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5450819


EC Microbiology
A Review of the CD4 T Cell Contribution to Lung Infection, Inflammation and Repair with a Focus on Wheeze and Asthma in the Pediatric Population

PMID: 26280024 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC4533840


EC Neurology
Identifying Key Symptoms Differentiating Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome from Multiple Sclerosis

PMID: 28066845 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5214344


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Paradigm Shift is the Normal State of Pharmacology

PMID: 28936490 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5604476


EC Neurology
Examining those Meeting IOM Criteria Versus IOM Plus Fibromyalgia

PMID: 28713879 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5510658


EC Neurology
Unilateral Frontosphenoid Craniosynostosis: Case Report and a Review of the Literature

PMID: 28133641 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5267489


EC Ophthalmology
OCT-Angiography for Non-Invasive Monitoring of Neuronal and Vascular Structure in Mouse Retina: Implication for Characterization of Retinal Neurovascular Coupling

PMID: 29333536 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5766278


EC Neurology
Longer Duration of Downslope Treadmill Walking Induces Depression of H-Reflexes Measured during Standing and Walking.

PMID: 31032493 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6483108


EC Microbiology
Onchocerciasis in Mozambique: An Unknown Condition for Health Professionals.

PMID: 30957099 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6448571


EC Nutrition
Food Insecurity among Households with and without Podoconiosis in East and West Gojjam, Ethiopia.

PMID: 30101228 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6086333


EC Ophthalmology
REVIEW. +2 to +3 D. Reading Glasses to Prevent Myopia.

PMID: 31080964 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6508883


EC Gynaecology
Biomechanical Mapping of the Female Pelvic Floor: Uterine Prolapse Versus Normal Conditions.

PMID: 31093608 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6513001


EC Dental Science
Fiber-Reinforced Composites: A Breakthrough in Practical Clinical Applications with Advanced Wear Resistance for Dental Materials.

PMID: 31552397 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6758937


EC Microbiology
Neurocysticercosis in Child Bearing Women: An Overlooked Condition in Mozambique and a Potentially Missed Diagnosis in Women Presenting with Eclampsia.

PMID: 31681909 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6824723


EC Microbiology
Molecular Detection of Leptospira spp. in Rodents Trapped in the Mozambique Island City, Nampula Province, Mozambique.

PMID: 31681910 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6824726


EC Neurology
Endoplasmic Reticulum-Mitochondrial Cross-Talk in Neurodegenerative and Eye Diseases.

PMID: 31528859 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6746603


EC Psychology and Psychiatry
Can Chronic Consumption of Caffeine by Increasing D2/D3 Receptors Offer Benefit to Carriers of the DRD2 A1 Allele in Cocaine Abuse?

PMID: 31276119 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6604646


EC Anaesthesia
Real Time Locating Systems and sustainability of Perioperative Efficiency of Anesthesiologists.

PMID: 31406965 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6690616


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
A Pilot STEM Curriculum Designed to Teach High School Students Concepts in Biochemical Engineering and Pharmacology.

PMID: 31517314 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6741290


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Toxic Mechanisms Underlying Motor Activity Changes Induced by a Mixture of Lead, Arsenic and Manganese.

PMID: 31633124 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6800226


EC Neurology
Research Volunteers' Attitudes Toward Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis.

PMID: 29662969 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5898812


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease.

PMID: 30215058 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6133268


News and Events


November Issue Release

We always feel pleasure to share our updates with you all. Here, notifying you that we have successfully released the November issue of respective journals and the latest articles can be viewed on the current issue pages.

Submission Deadline for Upcoming Issue

ECronicon delightfully welcomes all the authors around the globe for effective collaboration with an article submission for the upcoming issue of respective journals. Submissions are accepted on/before December 15, 2022.

Certificate of Publication

ECronicon honors with a "Publication Certificate" to the corresponding author by including the names of co-authors as a token of appreciation for publishing the work with our respective journals.

Best Article of the Issue

Editors of respective journals will always be very much interested in electing one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of the selected article will be honored with a "Best Article of the Issue" certificate.

Certifying for Review

ECronicon certifies the Editors for their first review done towards the assigned article of the respective journals.

Latest Articles

The latest articles will be updated immediately on the articles in press page of the respective journals.