Case Report
Volume 1 Issue 1S1 - 2016
Clinical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy: Observation, Surgery and Medical therapy
Caterina Pizzicaroli1*, Ioannis Malandrenis2, Giovanni Larciprete2, Federica Rossi2, Carlotta Montagnoli2, Edoardo Valli1-2 and Mario Segatore2
1Department of Obstetrics and Ginecology, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina Hospital, Rome, Italy
*Corresponding Author: Caterina Pizzicaroli, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tor Vergata Univerity Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Received: January 14, 2016; Published: January 20, 2016
Citation: Caterina Pizzicaroli., et al. “Clinical Management Of Ectopic Pregnancy”. EC Gynaecology 1.1S1 (2016): 1-11.
Abstract
The early diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy, made before the occurrence of complications linked to an hemodinamic instability, leads to a reduction of mortality from 35.5. to 3.8 per 1000 ectopic pregnancies .When the diagnosis is made, there are different therapeutic options that depend on the conditions of the patient, the β-hCG levels, the dimension of the adnexal mass, the condition of emergency, the site of the ectopic pregnancy and the compliance of the patient. The management can be surgical, medical and observational. Surgery can be performed in symptomatic patients with hemodynamic instability and clinical contraindications to Methotrexate therapy. Available surgical options for tubal pregnancy are: conservative treatment (salpingotomy), intermediate surgery (partial salpingectomy), and radical treatment (salpingectomy), usually performed by laparoscopy. Medical treatment by Methotrexate can be performed in stable, asymptomatic patient, with β-hCG values ≤ 3000-5000 mIU/mL and without ultrasonographic evidence of haemoperitoneum or fetal cardiac activity. Methotrexate therapy can be administered locally or systemically, with a fixed multiple dose or single dose regimen. The follow up of patients undergoing medical therapy consists of β-HCG evaluation until its serum level is undetectable. The proposal of a wait-and-see attitude can be made in absence of clinical symptoms, adnexal mass less than 4 cm at ultrasonographic evaluation, endopelvic free fluid less than 50 mL, low hCG levels (≤ 2000 mU/mL) and patient compliance in accepting potential complications like tubal rupture and haemorrhage. Other kinds of specific treatments are available for non tubal ectopic pregnancy.
Keywords: Methotrexate; Ectopic pregnancy; Medical therapy for ectopic pregnancy; Surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy
Introduction
In the 70’s, less than 20% of ectopic pregnancies were diagnosed before rupture, so there was a high rate of morbidity and mortality linked to this disease. Nowadays, there is a more valid vigilance by clinicians. Thanks to the help of transvaginal ultrasounds and serum β-hCG levels, that lead to a progress in the diagnosis, more than 80% of ectopic pregnancies are diagnosed as intact and this let it possible to follow a conservative management. The early diagnosis made before the occurrence of complications linked to a hemodinamic instability, has lead to a reduction of mortality from 35.5. to 3.8 per 1000 ectopic pregnancies [1-5].
When the diagnosis is made, there are different therapeutic options that depend on the condition of the patient, the β-hCG level, the dimension of the adnexal mass, the condition of emergency, the site of the ectopic pregnancy and the compliance of the patient. The incidence of recurrent ectopic pregnancy is between 5% and 20% and rises up to 32% following 2 ectopic pregnancies [5]. The expected resolution time of the ectopic pregnancy is between 3 to 7 weeks after MTX application [1].
Treatment
Guidelines provided by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists [6] stated that tubal pregnancy can be managed by laparotomy, operative laparoscopy, medically and occasionally by observation alone.
Observation - expectant management
In 1982, Mashiach., et al. [7] basing on the concept that early ectopic pregnancy can result in spontaneous reabsorption or tubal abortion, suggested the possibility of a self-limiting disease that can be faced with an expectant management. The first to practice it in patients with suspicion of ectopic pregnancy on admission was Lund, in 1995[8]. Accordind to RCOG guidelines [6] expectant management is an option for clinically stable asymptomatic women with an ultrasound diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy and a decreasing serum levels of β-hCG, initially less than 1000 IU/L (Grade of Recommendation C; Evidence level III). So, parameters that can lead to the proposal of a wait-and-see attitude are: absence of clinical symptoms, adnexal mass less than 4 cm at ultrasonographic evaluation, endopelvic free fluid less than 50 mL, low β-hCG levels (≤ 2000 mU/mL) that shows rapidly declining at the 48 hours re-evaluation [1], and patient compliance in accepting potential complications like tubal rupture and internal haemorrhage [9-10]. When proposing expectant management attention must be given in those patients who fail to resolve, because the risk of morbidity remains high [11]. In fact more than 90% of women with ectopic pregnancies undergoes an operative intervention because of increasing and endangering symptoms [1,5,12].
Surgical Treatment
Indications for surgery include: symptomatic patients with clear free fluid in the Douglas space, hemodynamic instability, rupture of the ectopic mass, clinical contraindications to Methotrexate (MTX) medical therapy, very high β-hCG levels, a coexistence of an intrauterine pregnancy, failed medical therapy or poor compliance with follow-up aftercare, lack of timely access to a medical institution for the management of tubal rupture and desire for permanent contraception [13-16]. The kind of surgery (laparotomic or laparoscopic) depends on the surgical anamnesis of the patient (previous laparotomic surgery) and her haemodynamic condition, and on the endoscopic skills of the surgeon. The adequate surgical option depends on the site of ectopic pregnancy.
Laparoscopy or Laparotomy
In recent years the surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy has shifted from an often urgent laparotomy to a more conservative laparoscopy [13]. Many other studies demonstrate that in hemodynamic stable patients, laparoscopy offers many advantages over laparotomy (less costs, hospitalization, surgery time, blood loss, analgesics and recovery time) [13,17,18]. At present, laparoscopy is the preferred treatment because almost all patients can be referred to it, it is safe and less expensive than laparotomy beacuse of reduced morbidity and shorter hospital stay [11,19]. In 1973 in the United States, Hope suggested the use of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy [20], then laparoscopy began to be widely used in the diagnostic management of ectopic pregnancy because it allowed an earlier diagnosis, solved the dilemma of prolonged clinical observation and avoided the risk of performing a not useful laparotomy [11,17,18].
RCOG guidelines stated that: a laparoscopic approach to the surgical management of tubal pregnancy, in the haemodynamically stable patient, is preferable to an open approach (Grade of Recommendation A; Evidence level Ia). Infact, a comparison of the two surgical techniques in 228 women in three randomized controlled trials showed that even if laparoscopic approach presented a greater risk of persistent trophoblast than laparotomy, the endoscopic procedure was associated with shorter operation times, less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stays and lower analgesic requirement [6]. Usually laparotomy is performed in women with extensive intraperitoneal bleeding, in case of tubal rupture, if there is a poor visualization of the pelvis during laparoscopy or if the patient is hemodinamically instable or presenting an high adherence status [21,22]. An isthmic location of an ectopic pregnancy, with a high intramural proportion, can be an indication for primary laparotomy because of the severe risk for uncontrollable intraoperative bleeding, even if these situations can often be treated laparoscopically. In all other circumstances, the operative management should be laparoscopic, if the hemodynamic status of the patient, the surgeon’s experience and the availability of endoscopic treatment allow it [1-22].
Tubal pregnancy
Conservative treatment (salpingotomy), intermediate surgery (partial salpingectomy), and radical treatment (salpingectomy) are the available surgical options for the treatment of a tubaric pregnancy [1-21]. Paramount importance has the so called “case to case” evaluation on the more appropriate surgery to be performed for that specific patient. Success rate depends on the permeability of the involved tube and on the status of the contra lateral tube.
A very important matter of debate is which kind of laparoscopic treatment (conservative-salpingotomy or radical-salpingectomy) should be performed in women wishing to preserve their reproductive capacity. There is no consensus in literature regarding the optimal treatment of tubal pregnancy for the manteinance of the fertility. The most important factor for future reproductive outcome after surgery for ectopic tubal pregnancy seems to be the status of contralateral tube [23]. In a randomized controlled trial of Mol F [11-24], where he compares salpingotomy and salpingectomy in women with a tubal pregnancy with a safe contra lateral tube, it is shown that salpingotomy doesn’t improve time to develop spontaneous pregnancy and it leads more often to persistent trophoblast. In other papers it’s reported that salpigotomy is associated with higher subsequent intrauterine pregnancy than salpingectomy, but that there is also a higher risk to develop recurrent ectopic pregnancy [23]. In case of tubal ectopic pregnancy in a patient who expresses the desire for future pregnancy and presents with a damage in contra lateral tube or in the absence of the contra-lateral tube, the treatment of choice is salpingotomy [25] if a salpingectomy has to be performed, the subsequent loss of fertility leads to the in vitro fertilization (IVF) as an appropriate treatment [11] for a future pregnancy.
Therefore in young patients (less than 30 years) without previous infertility and with a normal contralateral tube, the fertility rate after salpingectomy and after salpingotomy is comparable. In the presence of a healthy contralateral tube there is no clear evidence that salpingotomy should be used in preference to salpingectomy (Grade of Recommendation B; Evidence level IIa) [6]. Laparoscopic salpingotomy should be considered as the primary treatment when managing tubal pregnancy in presence of contralateral tubal disease and/or desire for future fertility (Grade of Recommendation B; Evidence level IIa) [6]. There are cases (previous ipsilateral extrauterine pregnancy, contralateral severe peri-annexial adherent condition) in which bilateral salpingectomy can be considered in order to improve the success rate of medical assisted reproduction techniques [21]. Obviously, after each conservative tubaric treatment, there is the need to control serum levels of β-hCG control to exclude the condition of a persistent trophoblast [21].
Conservative surgery
The success rate of medical and conservative surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancies, with no requirement for further treatment, is comparable [13,26,27,28,29,30]. Different conservative surgical options have been suggested in literature:
a. Transampullary aspiration and “Ampullary milking”: the first one consists in the aspiration of trophoblastic tissue from the tube without incision. The second one, “ampullary milking”, is possible just in selected cases, when the product of conception is located near the outer region of the tube or the fimbrial end and it can be removed by “milking” ipsilateral tube, pushing the product of conception until it is extruded into the abdominal cavity. This operation is organ saving but it has a high rate of incomplete removal, recurrence and trophoblast residuals [1,5,22].
b. Salpingotomy: usually performed in hemodinamically stable women with desire for future pregnancies, without contralateral tubal pathology and adhesions in the tubal wall, and in case of ampullar, infundibular or isthmic mass, less than 5 cm in size [5,22]. One of the most common complications of laparoscopic tubal salpingotomy in the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy is the incomplete removal of the products of conception as a persistent ectopic pregnancy requiring additional therapy [22]. This has to be kept in mind and be a fundamental part of the preoperational evaluation [3]. Twenty UI Vasopressin, in 100 mL of normal saline, is injected in the mesosalpinx near the tubal location of the gestational products before tubal preparation. Vasopressine allows a better operative management, presents a positive side effect on the prognosis and improves hemostasis. In addiction Vasopressin leads to a local hypoxia and causes a limitation of the metabolic rate of ectopic tissue and put it at risk [1,4,31].
Intermediate surgery: partial salpingectomy
Before salpingectomy is performed due to a failure of a salpingotomy, or in case of tubal rupture, ectopic isthmic pregnancy, or a recurrent tubal pregnancy, there is the possibility to try an intermediate surgical option. It is called partial salpingectomy and consists in a segmental tubaric resection [1,2].
Radical surgery: salpingectomy
No desire to maintain fertility, recurrence of tubal pregnancies or of extrauterine pregnancy after a failed sterilization, persistent bleeding after a conservative tubal procedure, previously reconstructed tube, tubal rupture, severe adhesions, hydrosalpinx and tubal pregnancy size more than 5 cm, represent the main indications for salpingectomy [1,22].
Non tubal pregnancy
The treatment for many locations of ectopic pregnancy is usually surgical:
a. Ovarian pregnancy can be treated laparoscopically because the possibility to perform a mini-invasive surgery by simple evacua- tion of the gestational product or ovarian wedge resection that let the remaining ovarian tissue be protected for the widest possible extention. Oophorectomy is not commonly needed [1,13,32].
b. Abdominal Pregnancy: if detected at early stage can be treated laparoscopically. But, because of the possibility of vessels invasion by the tumour that can cause an important bleeding, and due to the usually late diagnosis of this condition, the difficulty in placental removal, and the high risk for maternal life, the management of this kind of ectopic pregnancy almost always requires laparotomy [5]. However no consensus is nowadays reached in literature about the best treatment (medical or surgical) to perform in this kind of ectopic pregnancy.
c. Interstitial or Cornual Pregnancy: hemodynamic maternal instability or signs of ongoing rupture of the mass and, finally, contraindications in performing MTX therapy are the most common indications to perform surgical therapy. Laparoscopic cornual resection or salpingotomy can be performed [33]. Intramural pregnancy presents an increased risk of traumatic rupture with hemor rhagic shock and maternal death. Cornual pregnancy implants in the same anatomical area of the tube but opens into the uterine cavity. In case of larger pregnancies that can result in uterine perforation, curettage under laparoscopic guidance can be performed [2,5,31]. Hysteroscopic removal of cornual pregnancy has also been described but with an unclear efficacy [13].
d. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: There are many different kinds of treatment described in literature: hysteroscopic management [34] laparoscopy [35], selective transarterial embolization with subsequent dilatation and curettage and local or systemic injection of MTX [21,36]. Expectant management has been described but it presents with a poor prognosis due to the high risk of rupture [37]. Finally, in literature, the first trimester termination of pregnancy is suggested as the treatment of choice [1].
e. Cervical and Vaginal Pregnancy: Conservative therapy usually works just if the diagnosis is made before 12 weeks of gestation. Infact in this kind of ectopic pregnancy the throphoblast invasion can cause erosive lesions of uterine vessels leading to a massive hemorrage requiring surgical action by means of uterine artery embolisation or even hysterectomy [1,21]. In order to execute dilatation and curettage and to reduce the bleeding, helpfull preparatory treatment can be MTX injections, uterine artery em- bolization, vaginal ligation of the descending branch of uterine arteries, intracervical prostaglandin injection, cervical cerclage and balloon tamponade of the cervical canal [1,13].
f. Heterotopic Pregnancy: laparoscopic salpingectomy is the most used treatment [5]. The possibility of persistence of products of conception is the same after laparoscopy and laparotomy (5-15%) [1]. The preferential site where trophoblastic tissue can outlast is the medial portion of the tube. This is responsible for elevated serum β-hCG levels in the follow up [2,5,10].
Medical Treatment
According to RCOG guidelines [6], medical therapy should be offered to suitable women, and units should have treatment and follow-up protocols for the use of methotrexate in the management of ectopic pregnancy (Grade of Recommendation B; Evidence level IIa).
Methotrexate (MTX), a folinic acid antagonist, works by blocking DNA and partly also RNA synthesis and cell division. So, trophoblast, that is a rapid cellular turnover tissue, is particularly affected by its action [38,39]. Other systemic drugs like actinomycin D, prostaglandins, and RU-486 have also been suggested to be used in the medical treatment of an ectopic pregnancy [1].
In literature the first description of a successful treatment of a tubal pregnancy by systemic MTX dates back to 1985 [40]. Then, to reduce the side effects and the costs of the therapy and to improve the compliance of the patients, some authors suggested the use of individualized doses of of this drug [41].
Side effects
Medical MTX therapy presents with some side effects such as stomatitis, conjunctivitis, rash, alopecia, gastritis-enteritis, elevated liver enzymes, bone marrow suppression, photosensitivity, pleuritis and dermatitis [1,11]. Even if Methotrexate therapy has been shown to be safe a careful follow-up is recommended for women presenting with abdominal-pelvic pain in the few days following MTX therapy, to evaluate if it is required a surgical intervention because of a possible failure of medical treatment [42]. So, indications for treatment should be carefully evaluated, due to the possible failure of the therapy and the possible side effects [1].
If medical therapy is offered, women should be given clear informations (preferably written) about the possible need for further treatment and adverse effects following treatment. Women should be able to return easily for assessment at any time during follow-up (Grade of Recommendation B; Evidence level IIa) [6].
Indications
Medical therapy with MTX can be performed in patient that are stable, asymptomatic, with ß-hCG value ≤ 3000-5000 mIU/mL and without ultrasonographic evidence of haemoperitoneum or fetal cardiac activity [6,14,17]. According with RCOG guidelines, women most suitable for MTX therapy present with a serum β-hCG below 3000 IU/L and minimal symptoms (Grade of Recommendation B; Evidence level IIa) [6]. Some papers report that MTX therapy can be successful also with serum β-hCG levels higher than 3000 IU/L [17], but according to the paper of Sowter et al, quality-of-life data suggest that methotrexate is only an attractive option for women with an β-hCG below 3000 IU/L [6,43]. Even if this is not considered as a reliable predictor of therapeutic medical success and in literature there’s not a clear concern about it, some authors suggest, as a patient selection criterion for MTX therapy, a dimension of the mass less than 3-4 cm, maybe because women with larger adnexal masses are more likely to have them already ruptured [13-14-44]. Patient’s high operative risk or conditions that represents contraindications to anesthesia are also considered indications to try medical therapy [1].
Contraindications
Breastfeeding, immunodeficiency, alcoholism, chronic liver disease, preexisting blood dyscrasia, known ipersensitivity to MTX, active pulmonary or peptic ulcer disease and hepatic, renal or hemathologic dysfunctions, represent contraindications to MTX therapy. Some authors report cases of association between renal failure and MTX-associated death [13,45]. Relative contraindications to MTX therapy are : the presence of fetal cardiac activity, an ectopic mass with a diameter of more than 3 cm and β-hCG levels greater than 5000 IU/L [46].
Teratogenicity
MTX can cause some teratogenic effects on fetal neural tube, cardiovascular system and urinary tract. For this reason, it’s very important, before starting therapy, to be sure that there is not the concomitant presence of an intrauterine on going pregnancy [13,47].
Regimen
MTX therapy can be administered:
a. Locally (i.e. transvaginal): used for example in case of cervical pregnancy [21].
b. Systemically (intramuscular way): in his paper, Stucki reported that if the patient present with β-hCG value less than 5000 UI/L and a pregnancy diameter under 3 cm, a 88% success percentage rate accompanies systemic MTX administration [17]. Another important predictor of the outcome of MTX treatment seems to be the serum progesterone level. Infact if the serum progesterone level is more than 7–10 ng/mL there is a greater risk of failure with single-dose methotrexate [46]. A randomized study reports that patients who present with progesterone levels more than 10ng can equally profit from an oral treatment of 600 mg Mifepri- stone [48].
Two kinds of regimen are available:
b1. Fixed multiple dose regimen (MTX 1.0 mg/kg i.m daily 1,3,5,7 alternated with folinic acid 0.1 mg/kg orally on days 2,4,6,8) [13- 42]. The combination with folinic acid is used to reduce chemotherapy toxicity [49]. This regimen, when used in women with serum β-hCG levels below 3.000 UI/L, has been proven to be effective compared to laparoscopic salpingotomy [19].
b2. Single dose methotrexate calculated as 1.0 mg/kg or 50 mg/m2 i.m (without folinic acid) [42]. For most women MTX dose this is between 75 mg and 90 mg [6-29-30]. In women with β-hCG < 1.500 IU/L, this regimen has been shown to be cost effective com- pared to laparoscopic salpingotomy [43]. In addiction, it seems to offer the greatest benefits in terms of efficacy and tolerability, it has a very good patient compliance and it has also proved to be a good alternative to laparoscopy in some cases [42]. Women who present with β-hCG value of 3000-4000 mIU/mL have a greater probability to undergo surgery or multiple dose treatment [50]. Infact serum β-hCG levels values are evaluated on days four and seven and a further MTX dose is given if there’s not a fall by more than 15% between these two checks [6,29,30].
Single versus multiple dose regimen
There are just little data about the comparison between the fixed multiple dose methotrexate regimen and the single dose regimen and the authors report different conclusions about which one of the two regimen is preferred. Lipscomb in 1998 reported that multi-dose regimen was more successful (93%) when compared with single dose regimen (88%) but the second one, requiring not folate integration, presented less side effects (28% vs 48%) and was cheaper than the first one [51]. A randomized trial about the treatment of unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy in patients with β-hCG levels of about 2000 IU/L, has shown that the effect of the multiple (90%) and the single dose regimen (80%) were similar and that even if the first kind of regimen was associated with more side-effects, the time for serum β-hCG values to be less than 5 mU/mL was shorter than in single dose regimen (18 versus 22 days) [11-52]. Srivichai., et al. [53] reported a high success rate for single-dose MTX therapy (90%) but suggested to prefer multi-dose regimen or surgery in patients with big ultrasonographic adnexal masses or high β-hCG levels at the moment of the diagnosis. Other randomized trials pointed that the two kinds of regimen were comparable in terms of effectiveness [38,52,54,55].
Follow up
The follow up of a patient undergoing medical MTX therapy consists of β-hCG evaluation until serum level is undetectable. Infact, close β-hCG monitoring allows to diagnose treatment failure if there is an inadequate reduction of serum β-hCG concentration [11-56]. Some patients (15-20%) may require a second MTX dose, but less than 1% needs 3 doses or more [11-57]. To decide if it’s necessary to administer a second MTX, protocols can be useful. One protocol [41] suggests to consider day 1 as the day of MTX injection and then to evaluate the level of ß-HCG on days 4 and 7. If the decrease in serum levels is less than 15%, so a second intramuscular MTX dose (50 mg/m2) has to be given. Another protocol [14] suggests to evaluate β-hCG just on day 7. If its serum level is declined less than 25% when compared with day 1 serum level, a second MTX dose has to be administered.
The follow up after an operative treatment of an ectopic pregnancy requires to evaluate the reduction in β-hCG levels. It should be of at least 70% after 48 hours, and after a week should result in a decrease of another 70% [1]. Large uncontrolled studies have reported that less than 10% of women that underwent MTX therapy required surgery after medical approach, and that 14% of women nedeed 2 or more doses of MTX [6,44]. Outpatient medical therapy with single-dose methotrexate is associated with a saving in treatment costs (Grade of Recommendation A; Evidence level Ib) [6].
Success rate
Papers report a success percentage of MTX therapy of 74-100% [58]. The success rate of MTX therapy is closely related to:
a. β-hCG levels (the lower the serum level at the beginning of the therapy, the higher the success rate) [59-60]. Menon et al in a sys- tematic review of 503 patients treated with MTX, stated that if the initial β-hCG values were more than 5,000 mIU/mL, the percentage rate of treatment failure were statistically greater [61-62]. Another non-randomized clinical trial on 238 patients treated with MTX and elaborated with a logistic regression analysis showed that levels of β-hCG greater than 2,000 mIU/mL increased the odds of failure by about 4.5 times [61,63].
b. -Size of the ectopic mass. There is no consensus in literature about the maximum size of the ectopic mass that can be treated with medical MTX therapy, varying from 3,5 and 5 cm from different authors [9,19,30,61,64].
c. Endometrial thickness: recent papers related endometrial thickness with the indices of success or failure of MTX therapy. Start- ing from the concept that endometrial thickness reflects the hormonal levels and because of that the higher the level of β-hCG, the worse the prognosis of MTX therapy, so the authors stated that high values of endometrial thickness (in particular above 12 mm) are linked with significantly higher failure rates [61,64,66].
d. So, embryonic heart activity, mass greater than 4 cm, β-hCG values greater than 5,000 mIU/mL, presence of blood in the perito- neal cavity, increasing rate of β-hCG above 50% within 48 h prior to MTX, rapid and continuous increase of the β-hCG level during MTX therapy, ultrasonographic sign of a tubal ring or the visualization of a yolk sac and high endometrial tickness are considered as risk factors for faiulure of the medical therapy [9,38,64,67,68,69].
MTX vs surgery
So, the two ways to treat ectopic pregnancy are medical therapy or surgery that differentiate quite considerably for resource consumption. Site of the ectopic mass, clinical conditions of the patient and medical skills affect the choice of the treatment [70]. In a paper of Lecuru., et al. [71] it was reported that even if MTX therapy presented with shorter hospital stay and lower hospitalization rate, it presented a longer follow up with more visits and biological test when compared with laparoscopy. Dhar in his paper [42] stated that in patient with low β-hCG levels and adnexal mass less than 4 cm, MTX medical management seems to offer benefits over surgical treatment because it is less invasive and less expensive and it doesn’t require surgical skills. In addiction, he reported that future reproductive expectations are better with methotrexate with higher intrauterine pregnancy rates and lower ectopic rates subsequently. On the other side, due to the need of a prolonged follow up and because of the risk of a tubal rupture after MTX therapy, patient’s compliance to therapy represents an important selection criterion in the choice of the kind of therapy [42].
Persistent Throphoblast
According to RCOG guidelines [6], when salpingotomy is used for the management of tubal pregnancy, protocols should be in place for the identification and treatment of women with persistent trophoblast. Post-operative β-hCG evaluation represents a good option for detection and treatment of persistent trophoblast after salpingotomy. To prevent persistent trophoblast, phrophylactic single dose of systemic Metotrexate is reported to be more successful that salpingotomy alone [19].
Appendix: Images and Video
The first time is the injection of a vasoconstrictor substance in the mesosalpinx before salpingotomy, to increase hemostasis reducing the subsequent need of coagulation. Many surgeons perform bipolar coagulation on the free tubal surface before performing incision. The incision can be performed with a monopolar needle or a cold scissor possibly in the proximal third of the hematosalpinx. This is often sufficient to obtain the spontaneous exit of blood clots and trophoblastic tissue from the salpinx. The extraction can be completed by aspirating the residual trophoblastic tissue from the tubal incision.

Figure 1: Steps of salpingotomy.

Figure 2: Steps of salpingectomy.

Salpingectomy is often performed with bipolar forceps cause it is simply and cheap. Ultracision, ligasure and other more technological instruments can be used depending on the availability and the budget of the structure. Salpingectomy can be performed either from the uterine horn to the fimbrial portion (anterograde) or from the fimbrial portion to the uterine horn (retrograde). It is important to resect the tube as close as possible to uterus, to avoid cornual pregnancies in further in vitro fertilization pregnancies. When tubo-ovarian or fimbrial adhesions are detectable, the need to remove them and mobilize the ovary is mandatory. The tube is then tractioned and the tubal artery coagulated after the bifurcation from the ovarian artery. The coagulation and dissection of the mesosalpinx is performed with bipolar forceps and cold scissors near the tube to minimize the vascular damage to the ovary until the excision is completed. The tube is finally extracted using an endoscopic bag to minimize spread of trophoblastic tissue.
Video 1: Short cutted video with the whole procedure of salpingectomy by laparoscopy.
http://youtu.be/bSovaTPnnVo
Bibliography
  1. Alkatout I., et al. “Clinical diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy”. Obstetrical and Gynaecological Survey 68.8 (2013): 571-581.
  2. Alcatout I. “Ectopic Prgnancy. In: Schollmeyer T., et al. eds. Practical Manual for Laparoscopic & Hysteroscopic Gynecological Surgery”. (2013): 169-89.
  3. Murray H., et al. “Diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy”. Canadian Medical Association Journal 173 (2005): 905-912.
  4. Barbosa C., et al. “Laparoscopic management of ectopic pregnancy”. Manual of Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery (2010): 115-123.
  5. Hucke J and Füllers U. “Extrauterine Schwangerschaft”. Der Gynäkologe 6 (2005): 535-552.
  6. “The Management of tubal pregnancy (Reviewed 2010)”. Royal college of obstetricians and gynaecologists guidelines 21 (2004): 1-10.
  7. Mashiach S., et al. “Non operative management of ectopic pregnancy: a preliminary report”. JRM-The Journal of Reproductive Medicine 27 (1982): 127.
  8. Lund J. “Early ectopic pregnancy: comments on conservative treatment”. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the British Empire 62.1 (1995): 70-76.
  9. “American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Medical management of ectopic pregnancy”. Obstetrics & Gynecology 111.6 (2008): 1479-1485.
  10. Hoower KW., et al. Trends in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy in the United States”. Obstetrics & Gynecology 115.3 (2010): 495-502.
  11. Van Mello NM., et al. “Ectopic pregnancy: how the diagnostic and therapeutic management has changed”. Fertility and sterility 98.5 (2012): 1066-1073.
  12. Lipscomb GH., et al. “Nonsurgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy”. The New England Journal of Medicine 343.18 (2000): 1325-1329.
  13. Oron G and Tulandi T. “A pragmatic and evidence-based management of ectopic pregnancy”. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 20.4 (2013): 446-454.
  14. Tulandi T. “Ectopic pregnancy. 2013. UpToDate.
  15. Stock L and Milad M. “Surgical management of ectopic pregnancy". Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 55.2 (2012): 448-454.
  16. Nowak-Markwitz E., et al. “Cutoff value of human chorionic gonadotropin in realtion to the number of methotrexate cycles in the successful treatment of ectopic pregnancy”. Fertil and Steril 92.4 (2009): 1203-1207.
  17. Kadar N. “Early recourse to laparoscopy in the management of suspected ectopic pregnancy. Accuracy and morbidity”. JRM-The Journal of Reproductive Medicine 35.12 (1990): 1153-1156.
  18. Samuelsson S and Sjovall A. “Laparoscopy in suspected ectopic pregnancy”. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 51.1 (1972): 31-35.
  19. Hajenius PJ., et al. “Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy”. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 24.1 (2007): CD000324.
  20. Hope R. “The differential diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy by peritoneoscopy”. Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics 64 (1937): 229-234.
  21. Stucki D and Buss J. “The ectopic pregnancy, a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge”. Journal of medicine and life 1.1 (2008): 40-48.
  22. Saranovic M.,et al. “Ectopic pregnancy and laparoscopy”. Clinical and experimental obstetrics and gynecology 41.3 (2014): 276-279.
  23. Juneau C and Wright Bates G. “Reproductive outcomes after medical and surgical management of ectopic pregnancy”. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 55.2 (2012): 455-460.
  24. Mol F., et al. “Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre,randomised controlled trial”. Lancet 383.9927 (2014): 1483-14899.
  25. Bouyer J., et al. " Fertility following radical, conservative-surgical or medical treatment for tubal pregnancy: a population-based study”. BJOG 107.6 (2000): 714-721.
  26. Hajenius PJ., et al.“Randomised trial of systemic methotrexate versus laparoscopic salpingectomy in tubal pregnancy”. Lancet 350.9080 (1997): 774-779.
  27. Fernandez H., et al. “Fertility after ectopic pregnancy: the DEMETER randomized trial”. Human Reproduction 28.5 (2013): 1247-1253.
  28. Nieuwkerk PT., et al. “Systemic methotrexate therapy versus laparoscopic salpingostomy in patients with tubal pregnancy. Part I. Impact on patients’ health-related quality of life”. Fertil and Steril 70.3 (1998): 511-517.
  29. Saraj A., et al. “Resolution of hormonal markers of ectopic gestation: a randomized trial comparing single-dose intramuscular methotrexate with salpingostomy”. Obstet Gynecol 92.6 (1998): 989-994.
  30. Sowter MC., et al. “A randomized trial comparing single dose systemic methotrexate and laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of unruptured tubal pregnancy”. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 108.2 (2001): 192-203.
  31. Nezhat C., et al. “Ectopic pregnancy. Operative Gynecologic Laparoscopy: principles and techniques”. (1995): 107-120.
  32. Alcatout I., et al. “Organ-preserving management of ovarian pregnancies by laparosocpic approach”. Fertil and Steril 95.8 (2011): 2467-2470.
  33. Tulandi T and Al Jarouidi D. “Interstitial pregnancy: results generated from the Society of Reproductive Surgeon Registry”. Obstetrics & Gynecology 103.1 (2004): 47-50.
  34. Deans R and Abbot J. “Hysteroscopic management of caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy”. Fertil and Steril 93.6 (2009): 1735-1740.
  35. Lee CL., et al. “Laparoscopic management of an ectopic pregnancy in a previous caesarean section scar”. Human Reproduction 14.5 (1999): 1234-1236.
  36. Sugawara J., et al. “Successful conservative treatment of a caesarean scar pregnancy with uterine artery embolization”. Tohoku Journal Of Experimental Medicine 206.3 (2005): 261-265.
  37. Ash A., et al. “Cesarean scar pregnancy”. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 114.3 (2007): 253-263.
  38. Balci O., et al. “The efficacy of multiple-dose methotrexate treatment for unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy and conversion rate to surgery: a study on 294 cases”. Fertil and Steril 93.7 (2010): 2415-2417.
  39. Farquhar CM. “Ectopic pregnancy”. Lancet 366.9484 (2005): 583-591.
  40. Chotiner HC. “Nonsurgical management of ectopic pregnancy associated with severe hyperstimulation syndrome”. Obstetrics & Gynecology 66.5 (1985): 740-743.
  41. Stovall TG., et al. “Single-dose methotrexate for treatment of ectopic pregnancy”. Obstetrics & Gynecology 168 (1993): 1759-1765.
  42. Dhar H., et al. Methotrexate treatment of ectopic pregnancy: experience at Nizwa hospital with literature review”. Oman Medical Journal 26.2 (2011): 94-98.
  43. Sowter MC., et al. “An economic evaluation of single dose systemic methotrexate and laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of unruptured ectopic pregnancy”. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 108.2 (2001): 204-212.
  44. Lipscomb G., et al. “Predictors of success of methotrexate treatment in women with tubal ectopic pregnancies”. The New England Journal of Medicine 341.26 (1999): 1974-1978.
  45. Kelly H., et al. “A cautionary tale: fatal outcome of methotrexate therapy given for management of ectopic pregnancy”. Obstetrics & Gynecology 107.2 (2006): 439-441.
  46. Kirk E., et al. “The non-surgical management of ectopic pregnancy”. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 27.1 (2006): 91–100.
  47. Hernández-Diaz S., et al. “Folic acid antagonists during pregnancy and the risk of birth defects”. The New England Journal of Medicine 343 (2000) : 1608-1614.
  48. Rozenberg P., et al. “Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancies: a randomized clinical trial comparing methotrexate-mifepristone and methotrexate-placebo”. Human Reproduction 18.9 (2003): 1802–1808.
  49. Bagshawe KD., et al.“The role of lowdose methotrexate and folinic acid in gestational trophoblastic tumours (GTT)”. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 96.7 (1989): 795-802.
  50. Soliman KB., et al. “Safety and efficacy of systemic methotrexate in the treatment of unruptured tubal pregnancy”. Saudi Medical Journal 27.7 (2006): 1005-1010.
  51. Lipscomb GH., et al. “Analysis of three hundred fifteen ectopic pregnancies treated with single-dose methotrexate”. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 178.6 (1998): 1354–1358.
  52. Guvendag Guven ES., et al. “Comparison of single and multiple dose methotrexate therapy for unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy: a prospective randomised study”. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 89.7 (2010): 889-895.
  53. Srivichai K., et al. “Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a ten-year review of 106 cases at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital”. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 89.10 (2006): 1567-1571.
  54. Alleyassin A., et al. “Comparision of success rates in the medical management of ectopic pregnancy with single-dose and multiple-dose administration of methotrexate: a prospec- tive, randomized clinical trial”. Fertility and Sterility 85.6 (2006): 1661-1666.
  55. Hamed HO., et al. “Comparison of double and single-dose methotrexate protocols for treatment of ectopic pregnancy”. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics116.1 (2012): 67-71.
  56. Natale A., et al. “Pre and post treatment oatterns of human chorionic gonadotropin for early detection of persistence after a single dose of methotrexate for ectopic pregnancy”. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 117.1 (2011): 87-92.
  57. Barnhart KT., et al. “The medical management of ectopic pregnancy: a meta- analysis comparing ‘‘single dose’’ and ‘‘multidose’’ regimens”. Obstetrics & Gynecology 101.4 (2003): 778–784.
  58. Condous G., et al. “Should an ectopic pregnancy always be diagnosed using trans-vaginal ultrasonography in the first trimester prior to surgery?” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 22.S1 (2003): 227-236.
  59. Kirk E and Bourne T. “The nonsurgical management of ectopic pregnancy”. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 18.6 (2006): 587-593.
  60. Cho GJ., et al. ““Predictors of success of repeated injection of single-dose methotreaxate regimen for tubal ectopic pregnancy”. Journal of Korean Medical Science 21.1 (2006): 86–89.
  61. Cecchino GN., et al. “Methotrexate for ectopic pregnancy: when and how”. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 290.3 (2014): 417-422.
  62. Menon S., et al. “Establishing a human chorionic gonadotropin cutoff to guide methotrexate treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review”. Fertility and Sterility 87.3 (2007): 481-484.
  63. Sagiv R., et al. “The optimal cutoff serum level of human chorionic gon- adotropin for efficacy of methotrexate treatment in women with extrauterine pregnancy”. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 116.2 (2012): 101-104.
  64. Cobellis G., et al. “Methotrexate treatment for tubal pregnancy. Criteria for medical approach”. Minerva Ginecologica 55.6 (2003): 531-535.
  65. Da Costa Soares R., et al. “Endometrial thickness as an orienting factor for the medical treatment of unruptured tubal pregnancy”. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 83.3 (2004): 289-292.
  66. Takacs P., et al. “Evaluation of the relationship between endometrial thickness and failure of single-dose methotrexate in ectopic pregnancy”. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 272.4 (2005): 269-272.
  67. Moon MH., et al. “Outcome prediction for treatment of tubal preg- nancy using an intramuscular methotrexate proto- col”. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 27.10 (2008): 1461-1467.
  68. Potter MB., et al. “Predictors of success with methotrexate treatment of tubal ec- topic pregnancy at Grady Memorial Hospital”. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 188.5 (2003): 1192-1194.
  69. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. “Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a committee opinion”. Fertility and Sterility 100.3 (2013): 638-644.
  70. Zargar M., et al. “Comparison of single and multidose of methotrexate in medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy”. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 24.4 (2008): 586-589.
  71. Lecuru F., et al. “Hospital Resources Used for Ectopic Pregnancy Treatment by Laparoscopy and Methotrexate”. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 5.2 (2001): 117-122.
Copyright: © 2016 Nouf Atia Alsahafi., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

PubMed Indexed Article

EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
LC-UV-MS and MS/MS Characterize Glutathione Reactivity with Different Isomers (2,2' and 2,4' vs. 4,4') of Methylene Diphenyl-Diisocyanate.

PMID: 31143884 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6536005


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Alzheimer's Pathogenesis, Metal-Mediated Redox Stress, and Potential Nanotheranostics.

PMID: 31565701 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6764777


EC Neurology
Differences in Rate of Cognitive Decline and Caregiver Burden between Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Dementia: a Retrospective Study.

PMID: 27747317 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5065347


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Will Blockchain Technology Transform Healthcare and Biomedical Sciences?

PMID: 31460519 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6711478


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Is it a Prime Time for AI-powered Virtual Drug Screening?

PMID: 30215059 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6133253


EC Psychology and Psychiatry
Analysis of Evidence for the Combination of Pro-dopamine Regulator (KB220PAM) and Naltrexone to Prevent Opioid Use Disorder Relapse.

PMID: 30417173 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6226033


EC Anaesthesia
Arrest Under Anesthesia - What was the Culprit? A Case Report.

PMID: 30264037 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6155992


EC Orthopaedics
Distraction Implantation. A New Technique in Total Joint Arthroplasty and Direct Skeletal Attachment.

PMID: 30198026 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6124505


EC Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine
Prevalence and factors associated with self-reported chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults aged 40-79: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2012.

PMID: 30294723 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6169793


EC Dental Science
Important Dental Fiber-Reinforced Composite Molding Compound Breakthroughs

PMID: 29285526 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5743211


EC Microbiology
Prevalence of Intestinal Parasites Among HIV Infected and HIV Uninfected Patients Treated at the 1o De Maio Health Centre in Maputo, Mozambique

PMID: 29911204 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5999047


EC Microbiology
Macrophages and the Viral Dissemination Super Highway

PMID: 26949751 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC4774560


EC Microbiology
The Microbiome, Antibiotics, and Health of the Pediatric Population.

PMID: 27390782 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC4933318


EC Microbiology
Reactive Oxygen Species in HIV Infection

PMID: 28580453 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5450819


EC Microbiology
A Review of the CD4 T Cell Contribution to Lung Infection, Inflammation and Repair with a Focus on Wheeze and Asthma in the Pediatric Population

PMID: 26280024 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC4533840


EC Neurology
Identifying Key Symptoms Differentiating Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome from Multiple Sclerosis

PMID: 28066845 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5214344


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Paradigm Shift is the Normal State of Pharmacology

PMID: 28936490 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5604476


EC Neurology
Examining those Meeting IOM Criteria Versus IOM Plus Fibromyalgia

PMID: 28713879 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5510658


EC Neurology
Unilateral Frontosphenoid Craniosynostosis: Case Report and a Review of the Literature

PMID: 28133641 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5267489


EC Ophthalmology
OCT-Angiography for Non-Invasive Monitoring of Neuronal and Vascular Structure in Mouse Retina: Implication for Characterization of Retinal Neurovascular Coupling

PMID: 29333536 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5766278


EC Neurology
Longer Duration of Downslope Treadmill Walking Induces Depression of H-Reflexes Measured during Standing and Walking.

PMID: 31032493 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6483108


EC Microbiology
Onchocerciasis in Mozambique: An Unknown Condition for Health Professionals.

PMID: 30957099 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6448571


EC Nutrition
Food Insecurity among Households with and without Podoconiosis in East and West Gojjam, Ethiopia.

PMID: 30101228 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6086333


EC Ophthalmology
REVIEW. +2 to +3 D. Reading Glasses to Prevent Myopia.

PMID: 31080964 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6508883


EC Gynaecology
Biomechanical Mapping of the Female Pelvic Floor: Uterine Prolapse Versus Normal Conditions.

PMID: 31093608 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6513001


EC Dental Science
Fiber-Reinforced Composites: A Breakthrough in Practical Clinical Applications with Advanced Wear Resistance for Dental Materials.

PMID: 31552397 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6758937


EC Microbiology
Neurocysticercosis in Child Bearing Women: An Overlooked Condition in Mozambique and a Potentially Missed Diagnosis in Women Presenting with Eclampsia.

PMID: 31681909 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6824723


EC Microbiology
Molecular Detection of Leptospira spp. in Rodents Trapped in the Mozambique Island City, Nampula Province, Mozambique.

PMID: 31681910 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6824726


EC Neurology
Endoplasmic Reticulum-Mitochondrial Cross-Talk in Neurodegenerative and Eye Diseases.

PMID: 31528859 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6746603


EC Psychology and Psychiatry
Can Chronic Consumption of Caffeine by Increasing D2/D3 Receptors Offer Benefit to Carriers of the DRD2 A1 Allele in Cocaine Abuse?

PMID: 31276119 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6604646


EC Anaesthesia
Real Time Locating Systems and sustainability of Perioperative Efficiency of Anesthesiologists.

PMID: 31406965 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6690616


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
A Pilot STEM Curriculum Designed to Teach High School Students Concepts in Biochemical Engineering and Pharmacology.

PMID: 31517314 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6741290


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Toxic Mechanisms Underlying Motor Activity Changes Induced by a Mixture of Lead, Arsenic and Manganese.

PMID: 31633124 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6800226


EC Neurology
Research Volunteers' Attitudes Toward Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis.

PMID: 29662969 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5898812


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease.

PMID: 30215058 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6133268


News and Events

December Issue Release

We Always feel pleasure to share an update with you all. Here, notifying you that we have successfully released December issue for the respective journals and can be viewed in the current issue pages.

Submission Deadline for January Issue

E-Cronicon delightfully welcome all the authors around the globe for an effective collaboration with an article submission for the January issue of respective journals. Submissions are accepted on/before December 23, 2019.

Certificate of Publication

E-Cronicon honours with a "Publication Certificate" to the corresponding author by including the names of co-authors as a token of appreciation for publishing the work with our respective journals.

Best Article of the Issue

Editors of respective journals will always be very much interested in electing one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of the selected article will be honored with a "Best Article of the Issue" certificate.

Certifying for Review

E-Cronicon certify the Editors for their first review done towards assigned article of the respective journals.

Latest Articles

Latest articles will be updated immediately in the articles in press page of the respective journals.

Immediate Assistance

Prime moto of this team is to clarify all the queries without any delay or hesitation in order to avoid the inconvenience. For an immediate assistance on your queries please don't hesitate to drop an email to editor@ecronicon.uk